The Rorschach Test
After repeated letters from dozens of outraged psychologists and psychiatrists claiming that this page
"violates the copyright on the Rorschach Test", we feel compelled to post this notice:
The information presented here, including the outlines of the Rorschach
inkblots, is not in violation of copyright law. Please don't waste your
time writing us to complain or threatening to "turn us into the
Disclaimer Of Use
Reading the information provided here could compromise the
administration of the Rorschach test, invalidating your answers. If you
don't wish to take the Rorschach test (and we suggest NOT
taking it in the context of a custody dispute if at all possible), tell
the psychologist that you are familiar with the Rorschach test, have
read about the test and have seen the inkblots. Any ethical
psychologist will decline to administer the test upon learning this,
and the issue of the test's validity will be a moot point.
Please note that the sample responses shown below are not
necessarily "good" responses to the Rorschach. They are sample
responses provided only for purposes of illustration, and we don't
advise anyone to use the sample responses. What we advise is that you
DO NOT take a Rorschach test for any reason.
SPARC's position on the use of the Rorschach test is that it is an
inappropriate and unreliable test for use in the context of a child
custody evaluation, and that tests such as the Bricklin series or the MMPI-2 are more
suitable and more reliable for use personality evaluations in custody disputes.
Most people have heard of the Rorschach test (pronounced "ror-shock"), but few have ever
seen a real Rorschach inkblot. The blots are kept secret. When you see an inkblot in a popular
article on the test (as in the Encyclopaedia Britannica entry on the Rorschach test), it's a
fake: it's an an inkblot, but not one of the inkblots. There are only ten Rorschach inkblots.
Psychologists want the blots to remain a secret from the general public so that reactions to the
blots will be spontaneous. Hermann Rorschach hoped these spontaneous reactions would yield valuable
clues to the test subject's personality. Whether they do remains controversial. Many psychologists
think the Rorschach test is hopelessly unreliable; others see it as one of the cardinal tools of
modern psychodiagnosis. Even among those who acknowledge the value of the test, there is disagreement
on interpretation of responses.
Just as secret as the blots themselves are the ground rules for administering the test. There are
a few things that you, as a subject, are supposed to know and a lot of things you aren't supposed
to know. If you ask about something you're not supposed to know, the psychologist will give you a
pat answer as prescribed in Rorschach literature. For example, if you ask if it is okay to turn the
card upside down, the psychologist will respond that you may do as you like; it's up to you. The
psychologist won't say that many of the cards are easier to interpret when turned; that most people
do turn the cards; that he or she will make a notation with a little arrowhead every time you do
turn a card; and that you lose points in the initiative department if you don't turn the cards.
You'll be handed the cards one by one in the fixed order devised by Rorschach (there are numbers on
the backs of the cards for the psychologist's benefit). The first card, for instance, looks like a
fox's head or a jack-o-lantern. The cards are thick, rectangular cardboard, 6 5/8 inches by 9 1/5 inches.
Half of the blots are black ink on a white background. Two others are black and red ink on white, and
the last three blots are multicolored. The psychologist will always put each card in your hands "right"
You aren't supposed to know it, but the psychologist will write down everything you say. This includes
any seemingly irrelevant questions you may have. To keep you from getting wise, the psychologist always
arranges to sit to your side and a little behind you, so that you can't look at the card and the psychologist
at the same time. Most subjects realize the psychologist is taking notes, of course, but they don't realize
that the notes are a special shorthand record of everything said. Some psychologists use hidden tape recorders.
The psychologist will also time how long it takes you to respond, using a "tickless" watch. The
psychologist will not ask you to hurry up or slow down and will not make any reference to time, but response
times (in seconds) are one of the things he or she is writing in the notes.
Don't hold the card at an unusual angle. Watch how you phrase things. Say "This looks like ..."
or "This could be ..." never "This is..." After all, you're supposed to realize that it
is just a blot of ink on a card. By the same token, don't be too literal and say things as, "This
is a blotch of black ink." Don't groan, get
emotional, or make irrelevant comments. Don't put your hands on the cards to block out parts. The
psychologist will watch for all of the foregoing as signs of brain damage.
If there are no right answers for the test, there are some general guidelines as to what is a normal
response. You can probably see images in the inkblots proper and in the white spaces they enclose. Stick
to the former. Don't be afraid of being obvious. There are several responses that almost everyone gives;
mentioning these shows the psychologist you're a regular guy.
It is okay to be original if you can justify what you see in the shape, shading, or color of the blot. If
you see an abalone and can point out why it looks like one, then say so. Justifiable original responses
are usually judged to be indicative of creativity or intelligence.
You don't want non sequiturs, images that don't fit the blot in the judgment of the psychologist. These
may be signs of psychosis.
You're expected to see more than one thing on all or most of the cards. Not being able to see anything
on a card suggests neurosis. Usually the more things you can see, the better, as long as they fit the
form and color of the blot. Of course, you can see things in the whole blot or in parts of it, and images
Since time is a factor, it is important to come up with good answers fast. (It looks particularly bad if
you take a long time and give a dumb, inappropriate answer.) Copyright restrictions prevent us from showing you the
blots themselves, so we'll use outlines. We'll refer to the blots as psychologists do, as Plates I through
X. The psychologist won't mention the numbers to you, but the blots will always be in order.
Please note that some personal firewall products may prevent these images from appearing.|
If this occurs, disable your firewall temporarily to view the images.
Black ink. A roughly triangular shape, point down, suggesting a broad, foxlike face with prominent ears.
Naughty bits: a pair of breasts (rounded projections at top of blot); a vertical female figure, her torso
partly visible through a gauzy dress (along center line).
The first blot is easy. How fast you answer is taken as an indication of how well you cope with new situations.
The best reaction is to give one of the most common responses immediately. Good answers are bat, butterfly,
moth, and (in center of blot) a female figure. Mask, jack-o'-lantern, and animal face are common responses
too, but in some interpretation schemes they suggest paranoia. A bad response is any that says something
untoward about the central female figure. "She" is often judged to be a projection of your own self-image.
Avoid the obvious comment that the figure has two breasts but no head.
If you don't give more than one answer for Plate I, many psychologists will drop a hint--tell you to look closer.
Black and red ink. Two dark-gray splotches suggesting dancing figures. Red splotches at top of each figure and
at bottom center. Naughty bits: penis (upper center, black ink); vagina (the red area at bottom center).
It is important to see this blot as two human figures usually females or clowns. If you don't, it's seen as a
sign that you have trouble relating to people. You may give other responses as well, such as cave entrance (the
triangular white space between the two figures) and butterfly (the red "vagina," bottom center).
Should you mention the penis and vagina? Not necessarily. Every Rorsehach plate has at least one obvious
representation of sexual anatomy. You're not expected to mention them all. In some interpretation schemes,
mentioning more than four sex images in the ten plates is diagnostic of schizophrenia. The trouble is, subjects
who took Psychology 101 often assume they should detail every possible sex response, so allowances must be made.
Most Rorschach workers believe the sex images should play a part in the interpretation of responses even when
not mentioned. You may not say that the lower red area looks like a vagina, but psychologists assume that what
you do say will show how you feel about women. Nix on "crab"; stick with "butterfly."
Black and red ink. Two obvious .figures (black ink) facing each other. Butterfly-shaped red blot between the
figures; an elongated red blot behind each figure's head. Naughty bits: penises and breasts (at anatomically
appropriate positions for each figure).
This is the blot that supposedly can determine sexual preference. Most people see the two human figures. Both
figures have prominent "breasts" and an equally prominent "penis." If you don't volunteer the
gender of the figures, you'll be asked to specify it. By the traditional interpretation, seeing the figures
as male is a heterosexual response (for test subjects of both sexes). Describing the figures as female or
acknowledging the androgynous nature of the blot is supposed to be a homosexual response. Does it work? Not
really--many straights describe the figures as women, and not all gays give a gay response. A 1971 study at
Mount Sinai Hospital in New York showed the traditionally heterosexual response (two male figures) to be
declining in popularity.
The splotches of red ink are usually perceived separately. Common responses are "bow-tie" or "ribbon"
(inner red area) and a stomach and esophagus (outer red areas).
Black ink. A roughly triangular blot, point up, with the two lower comer regions resembling boots or pet.
Naughty bits: two penises (on either side of blot, near top of triangle); vagina (on center line near top
Plate IV is the "father card." At first glance it is a difficult blot to see as a single image.
The "boots" are fairly conspicuous; between them is the apparent head of a dog or Chinese dragon.
Many subjects see the blot as an animal skin. After a few seconds, though, most can see it as a standing
figure seen from below.
The boots become the feet, enlarged because of the unusual perspective. The arms and head, at the top, are
smaller. Common descriptions are bear, gorilla, or man in a heavy coat. Bad descriptions are monster or
attacking bear or gorilla-Rorschach theorists equate your description of the figure with your
perception of your father or male authority figures.
Black ink. A simple, batlike shape. Naughty bits: two penises (the "ears" or "antennae").
Rorschach himself thought this was the easiest blot to interpret. It is a bat or a butterfly, period. You don't
want to mention anything else. Seeing the projections on the ends of the bat wings as crocodile heads signifies
hostility. Seeing the paired butterfly antennae or feet as scissors or pliers signifies a castration complex.
Schizophrenics sometimes see moving people in this blot. Many psychologists take particular note of the number
of responses given to this plate. If you mention more images here than in either Plate IV or VI, it is
suggestive of schizophrenia.
Black ink. An irregular shape like that of an animal-skin rug. Naughty bits: penis (center line at top);
vagina (below penis).
Plate VI is the most difficult blot. The best-rendered penis of all the blots is at top, but few subjects
mention it. The rest of the blot doesn't look like much of anything. Some hold that the value of this blot is
to have the subject grope for images and possibly reveal subconscious attitudes about sexuality.
Basically, the secret of this plate is to turn it. A good response is to say it looks like an animal hide
(about the only reasonable response when held right side up), then turn it on its side and say it looks like a
boat or surfaced submarine with reflection, and then turn it upside down and say it looks like a mushroom cloud,
a pair of theater masks, or caricatures of men with long noses and goatees.
Black ink. A U-shaped blot, each side of the U resembling a female figure in a narrow-waisted dress. Naughty bits:
a vagina (on center line at bottom of U).
Christina Crawford meets projective psychology: This blot is supposed to reveal how you really feel about your
mother. Virtually everyone sees two girls or women. Deprecating descriptions of the figures~ "witches,"
"gossips," "girls fighting," "spinsters" indicate poor maternal relations. Seeing the
blot as thunderclouds instead of female figures suggests anxiety to some psychologists; seeing it as a walnut
kernel may mean a vulvar fixation.
There is an entirely different side to this blot, but you're not supposed to see it. The white space between
the girls or women can be interpreted as an oil lamp or similar object. It is claimed that only schizophrenics
usually see the lamp.
Pink, blue, gray, and orange ink. An almost circular array of interconnected forms--a gray triangle (point up)
at top, a pair of blue rectangles in the center, a pink and orange splotch at bottom, and two pink "animal"
shapes forming the right and left sides of the circle. Naughty bits: a vagina (pink-orange area at bottom).
The first full-color card is easy. It is important that you see the four-legged animals- lions, pigs, bears,
etc. -on the sides of the blot. They're one of the most common responses on the test, and you're assumed to
be a mental defective if you don't see them. Other good responses are tree (gray triangle at top), butterfly
(pink and orange area at bottom), and rib cage or anatomy chart (skeletal pattern in center between blue rectangles
and gray triangles). The entire configuration can be seen as a heraldic design (good answer) or a Christmas tree
with ornaments (reaching). Children tend to like this blot and say a lot about it-the bright colors and animal
shapes make it more interesting than your basic penis/vagina number (II, IV, or VI).
Green, orange, and pink ink. A very irregular upright rectangle. Orange at top, protruding green areas at center,
pink at bottom. Naughty bits: a vagina (center line at bottom).
There aren't many good answers here. If you're going to throw up your hands (figuratively; see warning about
emotional outbursts above) and plead a mental block, this is the place to do it. The colors clash, apparently
by Rorschach's design. Good answers are a fire with smoke, an explosion (but paranoids are claimed more apt to
note the pale green mushroom cloud on the center line at top), a map, anatomy, or a flower. If you turn the card
ninety degrees, you can make out a man's head in the pink areas at bottom. (The man is identified as Mark Twain,
Santa Claus, or Teddy Roosevelt.) A bad response is to describe the orange areas at top as monsters or men
fighting---a sign of poor social development. As with Plate V, the psychologist may be counting the number of
responses you give to this blot for comparison with the preceding and succeeding blots. You want to give fewer
responses to this blot.
Pink, blue, gray, green, yellow, and orange ink. A loose assortment of brightly colored shapes, the most chaotic
of the plates. Naughty bits: penis and testes (top center, gray ink).
The unspoken purpose of this last blot is to test your organizational ability. Plate X is full of colorful odds
and ends easy to identify---blue spiders, gray crabs, paired orange maple seeds, green caterpillars, a light-green
rabbit's head, yellow and orange fried eggs--and you're expected to list them. But the psychologist will also be
looking for a comprehensive answer, something that shows you grok the whole Gestalt. There are two good holistic
answers: sea life and a view through a microscope. Some subjects see two reddish faces at top center, separated
by the orange maple key. If you describe them as blowing bubbles or smoking pipes, it may be interpreted as
evidence of an oral fixation. Seeing the gray "testes" and "penis" as two animals eating a stick
or tree indicates castration anxiety.
Many professionals feel that the Rorschach is outdated, inaccurate, and meaningless. For example:
"Nobody agrees how to score Rorschach responses objectively. There is nothing to show what any particular
response means to the person who gives it. And, there is nothing to show what it means if a number of people give the same
response. The ink blots are scientifically useless." (Bartol, 1983).
What these comments seem to indicate is that the Rorschach is potentially unreliable, easily mis-interpreted, and essentially
not a valid means of determining what it claims to detect. For
more information on the use and potential unreliability of the
Rorschach test (including comments sent in to us by mental health
professionals) read the Additional Rorschach Information page and "Misuse of Psychological Tests in Forensic Settings: Some Horrible Examples" by Ralph Underwager and Hollida Wakefield.
"The only thing the inkblots do reveal is the secret world
of the examiner who interprets them. These doctors are probably saying
more about themselves than about the subjects." (Anastasi, 1982).
Another point worth noting is that even the APA doesn't condone the use
of 'outdated' tests, which the Rorschach would certainly qualify under:
APA ETHICAL PRINCIPLES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS AND CODE OF CONDUCT
2.07 Obsolete Tests and Outdated Test Results.
(a) Psychologists do not base their assessment or intervention
decisions or recommendations on data or test results that are outdated
for the current purpose.
(b) Similarly, psychologists do not base such decisions or
recommendations on tests and measures that are obsolete and not useful
for the current purpose.
Finally, you may also take the Rorschach Test online if you like. :)